Posts: 1,298
Threads: 62
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
86
Kind of amazing how bad Laravel 5.2 did vs the popularity of Laravel. I've been learning 5.2 lately, and wasn't aware that it might be so slow.
Posts: 94
Threads: 25
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
1
06-13-2016, 05:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2016, 05:54 PM by iridion2015.)
@cartalot
nice sharing dude +1
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation:
0
CodeIgniter isn't the ideal, do we really need PHP frameworks when there is a functional programming language that doesn't locked you in and language wise give raw performance, >6 times CI3 performance, without compromise in type safe.
PHP7 is 10x slow than Swift 3 and Go.
Framework is 10x complexity than Swift 3 and Go.
Dynamic language is easier to make mistake than compiled language.
It spent lot of time reading code and less time to solve simple problem where CURL does really shine.
If you have a choice, you won't choose Lumen, Laravel and CI.
Posts: 478
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
21
This test isn't a very good basis to see which frameworks are the fastest. I'd imagine almost all CI applications end up building out or including features that are already in Zend and Laravel from the get go which slows them down.
I'd like to see the same test with all the frameworks running similar features. I'd imagine the difference is much smaller.
Codeigniter is simply one of the tools you need to learn to be a successful developer. Always add more tools to your coding arsenal!
Posts: 1,062
Threads: 42
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
73
@Ivo Miranda
You are right, there are many factors. I think though this test was fair, in that it tested something, equally across frameworks. It is not absolute and no-one is claiming any absolute conclusions to be made from it. No one says CI is best overall, absolutely with no debate. But it is nice to see our favorite framework performing so well in a speed test.
Imagine the reaction if CI had been last, by a long way. Now that might have caused concern would it not? So the test did something, and could have had a completely different result.