Matchbox RC2

[eluser]Tony Nash[/eluser]
Zacharias,

Thanks for the fast reply. Also your google forge seems very consistent and nice.

I have few more questions if you mind

[quote author="Zacharias Knudsen" date="1205468000"]A) You'll have to keep the "application/controllers" folder no matter what library you use. However, in Matchbox you won't have to place anything in there. ME on the other hand, will require you to have at least one controller for routing purposes in there.[/quote]

How would matchbox handle this then? From other posts I think its from route file. Please correct me?

B) Both are capable of calling resources from other modules with one major difference. Only ME can call controllers from other modules. Apart from that, it's the same.

Dose that mean I cannot call controllers in /app../modules/module1/module1.php from /app../modules/module2/module2.php?

Also can I not call any libraries or helpers in moduler1 from moduler2?

Now, on the matter of which to choose, I think it boils down to personal preference. Basicly this is how the two differ
Matchbox
No need to alter codingstyle
Extends CodeIgniter core
Includes routing functionality (e.g. URI /modulename/controller will lead to correct module)

Will this work with language sites? ex: domain.com/nl/modules/modulename/controller

You can split an existing application into modules and still have it work

Modular Extensions
Requires some adjustments in the way you code
An additonal library, no extending of core
No built-in routing (you have to route yourself)
Can be used as HMVC controllers