Welcome Guest, Not a member yet? Register   Sign In
[split] Arguing for an ORM
#12

@sintakonte Your last post *is* describing how your relations work, and is a good starting point Smile

A proposed iterface would be those classes or interfaces that would need to be implemented conforming to CI4, i.e. a CI4-specific API. There is no panic to this, as we will be just a bit busy for the next few weeks getting 4.0.0-alpha.1 out the door!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[split] Arguing for an ORM - by sintakonte - 09-17-2018, 12:39 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by ciadmin - 09-17-2018, 03:12 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by sintakonte - 09-17-2018, 04:04 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by Pertti - 09-17-2018, 06:33 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by sintakonte - 09-17-2018, 07:07 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by ciadmin - 09-17-2018, 07:41 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by skunkbad - 09-17-2018, 02:38 PM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by InsiteFX - 09-17-2018, 02:40 PM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by php_rocs - 09-17-2018, 03:40 PM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by kilishan - 09-17-2018, 08:32 PM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by sintakonte - 09-18-2018, 01:49 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by ciadmin - 09-18-2018, 07:03 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by ignitedcms - 10-02-2018, 10:29 PM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by Pertti - 10-03-2018, 12:23 AM
RE: [split] Arguing for an ORM - by InsiteFX - 10-03-2018, 03:36 AM



Theme © iAndrew 2016 - Forum software by © MyBB