+- CodeIgniter Forums (https://forum.codeigniter.com)
+-- Forum: Archived Discussions (https://forum.codeigniter.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=20)
+--- Forum: Archived Libraries & Helpers (https://forum.codeigniter.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=22)
+--- Thread: DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 (/showthread.php?tid=42440)
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-25-2011
[eluser]WanWizard[/eluser]
The '_id' suffix is indeed hardcoded.
As this would be an API change, potentionally breaking existing applications, don't expect it before the next major release.
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-25-2011
[eluser]heldrida[/eluser]
Hi WanWizard,
I would like to report a bug. If the controller has the same name of model, save() wont be available!
For example,
CONTROLLERS/menu.php
$menu = new Menu();
$menu->name = 'myMenu';
$menu->save();
OUTPUT: ( ! ) Fatal error: Call to undefined method Menu:
ave()MODELS/menu.php
Code:
class Menu extends DataMapper {
var $table = 'menus';
// Optionally, don't include a constructor if you don't need one.
function __construct($id = NULL)
{
parent::__construct($id);
}
// Optionally, you can add post model initialisation code
function post_model_init($from_cache = FALSE)
{
}
}After renaming the table to "M" and Model Menu as "M", worked just fine!
Keeping the model as "MENU" and the controller "TEST", works fine!
I'm using Codeigniter 2.0.2! Still, I have to test in a diferent project, or a clean copy.
In the present project, I'm using a MY_CONTROLLER, my controllers are extending MY_CONTROLLER.
"TEST" controller above extended MY_CONTROLLER and worked fine!
"MENU" controller above extended both CI_CONTROLLER and MY_CONTROLLER, with the reported error.
Thanks for looking
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-25-2011
[eluser]WanWizard[/eluser]
That is not a bug, that's a PHP limitation. All your classes must have unique names, PHP doesn't have a concept of models and controllers.
This is why all CI classes are prefixed with CI_, and lots of people prefix (or suffix) their model classes.
You are getting this error because "new Menu()" will create a new instance of your controller class. Your model isn't even loaded!
This could be solved by a specific naming scheme in conjunction with a cascading filesystem autoloader, or by namespaces, like some other frameworks do. But that doesn't work with CI.
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-25-2011
[eluser]heldrida[/eluser]
Thanks a lot for letting me know that
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-27-2011
[eluser]Spelljack[/eluser]
Hello WanWizard,
Could you please consider adding a model prefix/suffix option to next version or a patch for it? I hacked the DM to use it.
I added this to "config/datamapper.php"
Code:
$config['model_suffix'] = '_model';Then make some changes in libraries/datamapper.php to replace $config['model_suffix'] with '' where he uses the model name as database name.
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-27-2011
[eluser]WanWizard[/eluser]
Could you do me a favor, and fork the Datamapper repo on bitbucket, apply your modifications to the fork, and then send me a pull request?
That would save me recreating your solution...
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-27-2011
[eluser]heldrida[/eluser]
I'm trying for Adjancency list without success, the following, for the example I gave above:
Tbl Category
id | name | category_id
1 | catA | 0
2 | catB | 0
3 | catC | 1
4 | catD | 2
5 | catE | 3
class Category extends DataMapper {
Code:
var $has_many = array(
'parent' => array(
'class' => 'category',
'other_field' => 'category'
),
'category' => array(
'other_field' => 'parent'
)
);Actually, I've tried diferent ways for doing this. The closest I think was,
var $has_many = array(
'category' => array(
'class' => 'category',
'other_field' => 'category'
)
);
Where the query gives an error when trying,
$catB = new Category();
$catB->where('name','catB')->get();
$catA = new Category();
$catA->where('name','catA')->get();
$catA->save($catB);
I can see it tryed to select from "categories_categories". Where $table = "categories";
Can someone give one example based on this table scheme I gave above ?
Thanks!
[quote author="WanWizard" date="1308958026"]If you're looking to store tree structures, you might want to have a look at the nestedsets extension, included in the Datamapper distribution. See http://datamapper.wanwizard.eu/pages/extensions/nestedsets.html for more information.
If you insist on using Adjacency lists:
Code:
class Mylist extends DataMapper {
$has_many = array(
'parent' => array(
'class' => 'mylist',
'other_field' => 'mylist',
),
'mylist' => array(
'other_field' => 'parent',
)
);
}You'll have to write the methods to navigate through the list yourself, where the nestedsets extension includes all methods to deal with parents, children and siblings...[/quote]
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-27-2011
[eluser]Spelljack[/eluser]
[quote author="WanWizard" date="1309189475"]Could you do me a favor, and fork the Datamapper repo on bitbucket, apply your modifications to the fork, and then send me a pull request?
That would save me recreating your solution...[/quote]
Yea. But it could have some errors. Anyway I will.
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-27-2011
[eluser]Spelljack[/eluser]
[quote author="Spelljack" date="1309191835"][quote author="WanWizard" date="1309189475"]Could you do me a favor, and fork the Datamapper repo on bitbucket, apply your modifications to the fork, and then send me a pull request?
That would save me recreating your solution...[/quote]
Yea. But it could have some errors. Anyway I will.[/quote]
I created a fork. Please check it. I could miss some places that add/remove model prefix/suffix on some class calls. I couldn't do a full test.
This solution only affects initalizing new instance. other uses are not affected. Eg calling related model: $user->group->get();
I tested it on many to many relationships.
DataMapper ORM v1.8.1 - El Forum - 06-27-2011
[eluser]WanWizard[/eluser]
@heldrida,
If your relation is many-to-many, you will need a relationship table, which in this case is called categories_catergories.
If it isn't (which is the case because you use an ITFK), you need to define the parent as has_one (categories can have only one parent categorie), and the children as has_many. If you do that, the relationship table is not used in constructing the queries.