| A3M vs. Ion Auth |
(12-25-2014, 07:11 PM)RitterCox Wrote: I'm using A3M for a long time now, and have no problem with it security. Would recommend using A3M, as an easy start to a project for "user management" rather for authentication. As one of the developers of A3M, I would say that this is probably the most accurate description. A3M is intended as a starting point to get quickly started with an application and cover the basics. A3M is a good starting point, but still has a long way to go. The new version for CI3 will be dependent on HybridAuth for authentication which will allow to get users from many other points, but with it come problems that HybridAuth is struggling with. Also IonAuth has had many more people work on it and look at it then A3M so that makes it a bit better looking and more likely to have less possible issues. If you are using A3M I would like to encourage you to submit fixes and improvements, thanks! https://github.com/donjakobo/A3M/tree/ci3-beta |
| Messages In This Thread |
|
A3M vs. Ion Auth - by includebeer - 11-22-2014, 03:05 PM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by Hobbes - 11-24-2014, 10:32 AM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by tomlagard - 11-24-2014, 08:52 PM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by includebeer - 11-25-2014, 02:15 PM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by Hobbes - 11-27-2014, 03:27 AM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by includebeer - 11-27-2014, 12:50 PM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by RitterCox - 12-25-2014, 07:11 PM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by Storyteller - 02-09-2015, 07:51 PM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by dollardad - 02-09-2015, 10:59 PM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by umefarooq - 02-10-2015, 12:46 AM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by wolfgang1983 - 03-14-2015, 07:13 AM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by Oscar165 - 03-14-2015, 09:15 AM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by includebeer - 03-14-2015, 09:16 AM
RE: A3M vs. Ion Auth - by silentium - 03-16-2015, 10:49 AM
|
