Welcome Guest, Not a member yet? Register   Sign In
Poll: Which of the following policies do you support, for spam control?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
disable signatures on posts
4.55%
4 4.55%
don't allow company logos for avatars
10.23%
9 10.23%
don't allow signatures or avatars during probationary period
10.23%
9 10.23%
increase moderated posts (probation) from 2 to 5
9.09%
8 9.09%
insist on oauth authentication/login
5.68%
5 5.68%
only allow non-probationary users to use links in posts
11.36%
10 11.36%
only allow letters, digits & underscore in user names (no emails)
12.50%
11 12.50%
purge "inane" posters (or redirect them to w3schools?)
6.82%
6 6.82%
use filter to identify spam content (akismet?)
14.77%
13 14.77%
use "nofollow" links everywhere
14.77%
13 14.77%
Total 88 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Forum Policy Changes Feedback Requested
#8

I have tried to get involved/help people on Stack Overflow (5 answers?), but somehow it dosen't feel as "warm" as a dedicated forum. I know it's hard to keep up and fight back bad content, it's not like you guys get paid to do it.

@php_rocs: I agree, it's going to be hard for all new users to survive a CI3 to CI4 upgrade on Stack Overflows hashtag system. +1 on "janitor" signup so more people can help to keep this community clean.

I have used a lot of resource and information from Stack Overflow that works, but will never get as trustworthy as getting answers from the source itself.

I voted to increase the amount of posts being moderated. But I think signatures should't work before you have made 40+ posts. And if you get caught with a bad signatures. It get's deleted and you privilege removed (warning first ofc).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Forum Policy Changes Feedback Requested - by jlp - 12-04-2018, 11:53 AM
RE: Forum Policy Changes Feedback Requested - by jreklund - 12-05-2018, 12:11 PM



Theme © iAndrew 2016 - Forum software by © MyBB