Standard libraries vs. Modular Extensions / Matchbox |
[eluser]Dave Stewart[/eluser]
Hi All, I'm about to release a really useful Navigation library that should get any CI developer making sites that are more than a few pages really excited. The Base Install which is all you need to get started, is just a single library and a single config file, so no great shakes with distribution there. However, the Development Install (with a bunch of development tools in a manner similar to Scaffolding) would consist of: - The main Library - The main Config file - A Utility library - A Utilities controller - up to 5 Views for each of the Utilities (I could hard-code much simpler versions into the controller, but what a headache) - Optional additional user-defined Config files Obviously for the Development Install the traditional CI file schema would be a total headache, so I've been looking at the two extensions named above (Modular Extensions & Matchbox). So, my questions are: - Is this the best way to go, to have developers install a library before being able to work with all the extra tools? - Which one of the two is easiest to get up and running with (PHP 4/5)? - Are they both still being actively developed? Many thanks for your input, Cheers, Dave |
Messages In This Thread |
Standard libraries vs. Modular Extensions / Matchbox - by El Forum - 07-02-2008, 02:12 PM
Standard libraries vs. Modular Extensions / Matchbox - by El Forum - 07-02-2008, 05:41 PM
Standard libraries vs. Modular Extensions / Matchbox - by El Forum - 07-02-2008, 05:52 PM
Standard libraries vs. Modular Extensions / Matchbox - by El Forum - 07-02-2008, 06:04 PM
Standard libraries vs. Modular Extensions / Matchbox - by El Forum - 07-02-2008, 06:26 PM
|