| Simple HMVC |
In my opinion if you can direct route to a module it is MVC and not HMVC. It's a request that goes from top to bottom. If you can direct route to a module, why not just make it a regular controller with a bunch of libraries, models and views etc.
As for packages, it may look like packages. But if i'm not mistaken, you can load only one package at a time. And as many say, call it what you want. If a packages, containing independent classes (models, views, libraries etc.), would be controlled through a controller request, isn't that then still HMVC? |
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 09-23-2015, 03:46 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 09-24-2015, 02:41 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by skunkbad - 09-24-2015, 01:35 PM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 09-24-2015, 11:02 PM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 09-25-2015, 02:15 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by kenjis - 09-25-2015, 05:04 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 09-25-2015, 05:10 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by mwhitney - 09-25-2015, 06:54 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 09-25-2015, 06:59 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by kilishan - 09-25-2015, 07:08 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 09-25-2015, 07:20 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 10-15-2015, 04:24 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by nasser.man - 10-15-2015, 12:13 PM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 10-16-2015, 01:54 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Sentro - 10-30-2015, 01:37 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 10-30-2015, 01:48 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Sentro - 10-30-2015, 02:10 AM
RE: Simple HMVC - by Martin7483 - 10-30-2015, 02:15 AM
|
