Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries

Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries

Narf
Me
Posts: 1,589
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 121

#10

02-02-2016, 11:29 AM

No, it doesn't. Smile

Not for anybody above the "junior developer" level. And if you'll be paying juniors to do a job for you, well ... you know you probably wouldn't be happy with the result anyway.

Messages In This Thread

Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by pb.sajjad - 02-01-2016, 05:53 PM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by skunkbad - 02-01-2016, 07:39 PM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by albertleao - 02-01-2016, 08:13 PM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by ivantcholakov - 02-02-2016, 12:13 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by Narf - 02-02-2016, 05:16 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by pb.sajjad - 02-02-2016, 04:42 PM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by Narf - 02-03-2016, 02:32 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by ivantcholakov - 02-02-2016, 05:42 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by PaulD - 02-02-2016, 05:52 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by Narf - 02-02-2016, 06:04 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by ivantcholakov - 02-02-2016, 07:28 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by Narf - 02-02-2016, 11:29 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by kilishan - 02-02-2016, 01:03 PM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by Narf - 02-02-2016, 03:18 PM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by kilishan - 02-02-2016, 03:34 PM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by arma7x - 02-03-2016, 12:11 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by Diederik - 02-03-2016, 01:51 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by sv3tli0 - 02-03-2016, 08:46 AM

RE: Active Records Performance vs Raw Queries - by mwhitney - 02-05-2016, 02:51 PM