Welcome Guest, Not a member yet? Register   Sign In
CodeIgniter vs Kohana: which one to choose?
#1

[eluser]Unknown[/eluser]
I know I know, this is a CI forum so I suppose asking such a question here doesn't make much sense. Thing is, Kohonaphp.com's forums are pretty bleh (quite ugly and inconvenient, and most of all seemingly quite inactive), so I was figuring posting here was the best way to get feedback from users who have tried out both frameworks.

So, I discovered CI about two weeks ago after googling PHP web frameworks for a while. CI was mentioned a lot as a very lightweight, fast, yet featureful and extremely well documented/user-friendly framework, so I gave it a try. It didn't seem nearly as rich as Rails (which I poked around with for a few weeks), but it did feel really nice and, indeed--lightweight and fast.

After playing around with it for a few days, I then heard about Kohana. Kohana is said to be "CI on steroids"--basically the same stuff, but strictly PHP5 and with lots of improvements/additional features here and there. So I gave it a try as well... and really liked it. Pure features-wise, it seemed--indeed--a level above CI. And since I don't need PHP4 compatibility, I ended up figuring it was the ideal framework I was looking for.

Fact is I'm still hesitating a bit, for two major reasons:
1. Kohana seems young. Maybe a bit too young. Most people don't even seem to know about it. Documentation is pretty good but still lacking; community seems small; forums look pretty much inactive. The latest official download package includes a module which is outdated and therefore doesn't even work (Auth). Young indeed...
2. Performance. I need to know if Kohana is as fast as CI (or faster for that matter), but I don't seem to find any decent benchmark out there. I don't really have the time to run some myself--I don't even know how to make proper ones anyway. PHP 5.2 (which is supported by Kohana afaik) is supposed to bring some performance enhancements, but who knows if it's being exploited correctly.

Has anyone run some performance tests (preferably with the most recent versions of the two frameworks) and can give me an idea of which one performs (overally) better, and by how much of a margin? I'm also interested in general comments about what you guys think about Kohana in general, why you haven't switched, etc.

Thanks! Smile
#2

[eluser]wiredesignz[/eluser]
I think the best answer is for you to do your own research and trials and not rely on our CI centric opinions.

It would be better to ask about kohana on the kohana forums, I'm sure they'll oblige you with an answer.

For my part I prefer the CodeIgniter community because there is strong support between the members and it is very friendly. CI itself is fast, lightweight, easy to learn and easy to use, what else does anyone need?
#3

[eluser]nmweb[/eluser]
I switched to Kohana after having using CI for a long while. The lack of progress in CI was what annoyed me, not so much the sticking to php4. I felt that CI kept me back from using proper OO and design patterns. CI has helped me a lot but for me it was just time to move on.

The CI community indeed is larger but you'll find the Kohana community is just as helpful.

On the topic of speed I think CI is a little faster with a simple hello world application but Kohana becomes faster the minute you use a database. Overall I find it not really an issue when you compare CI and Kohana to frameworks like Symphony or Cake which are significantly slower. I mean I use Kohana's ORM extensively since it speeds up development time and when performance of the web application becomes an issue, I can always remove ORM and rewrite the methods in normal php. Besides, 20% of the performance of an application is determined server-side, meaning 80% of the performance is client-side and you can easily improve a lot there with gzip, image sprites, javascript packers etc.
#4

[eluser]fredwu[/eluser]
I think this could help you a little bit, it was a quick comparison I wrote a while ago:

http://thislab.com/2008/02/23/notes-on-c...nd-kohana/

Smile
#5

[eluser]Derek Allard[/eluser]
I think you already answered your own question. Kohana developers (some of whom have already chimed in on this thread) are of course going to favour it. At the end of the day, you need to make your own decision, and the only way to do this properly, is to try both out. Good luck.
#6

[eluser]louis w[/eluser]
I am not aware of kohana, but I have to say it would worry me a bit to start to develop on a framework which has a "bleh" forum. Part of the appeal to me of CI (or any other open technology I choose) is that it has a community. I want support from other people doing what I do for help or to bounce ideas off of.
#7

[eluser]nmweb[/eluser]
[quote author="Derek Allard" date="1206217177"]I think you already answered your own question. Kohana developers (some of whom have already chimed in on this thread) are of course going to favour it. At the end of the day, you need to make your own decision, and the only way to do this properly, is to try both out. Good luck.[/quote]

I agree with Derek here. You have to decide in the end. I personally have done a lot of frameworks shopping at several occasions. I have also seen quite some nice ideas that some frameworks employ. I finally choose CI over other frameworks because of the simplicity and straightforwardness and very important, extendability. I incorporated several ideas into my blend of CI and now I do the same with Kohana.

Anyway, I would very much recommend to do some shopping, take a look at Zend Framework, Symphony, Cakephp and outside of the php realm, Ruby on Rails and Django. What is it you desire from a framework? Do you want a lot of magic happening or a more straightforward approach? It's all up to you and when you get stuck there are always people willing to help you out.
#8

[eluser]louis w[/eluser]
K is nice thou how it is php5 only. Supporting php4 is like developing websites for netscape.
#9

[eluser]Derek Allard[/eluser]
Its much, much more like developing a site for Internet Explorer.
#10

[eluser]louis w[/eluser]
[quote author="Derek Allard" date="1206225710"]Its much, much more like developing a site for Internet Explorer.[/quote]

I was trying to say that its like developing on a antiquated platform. Developing for IE sucks, but its still current.




Theme © iAndrew 2016 - Forum software by © MyBB