[eluser]CoffeeBeanDesign[/eluser]
Fair point.
I'm currently doing a project for a disability charity so am super accessibility aware.
JS only links are bad form even if there is an alternative nearby. The non JS/screen reader/text browser thinks "looks like a link, smells like a link... but it ain't a link!"
Of course 99.5% of CI Docs visitors will have JS and are fully capable of working it out if they haven't... But why should they have to?? And what about Mr 0.5%?
I know it's a tiny thing but lots of tiny things add up to a big tiny thing.