Is CI logging levels order correctly defined?

[eluser]Unknown[/eluser]
Hi,
I just started to use CI and couldn't find a topic asking this question. When checking the logging (Error handling) part of CI I've found an inversion of the common use logging levels, in this case the info level is considered more verbose than debug level.

I understand that is a case of convention but common logging practices define logging levels as (more verbose to less verbose) as:

trace > debug > info > warn > error > fatal

Usually I adopt the JBoss logging conventions. I don't see the need to adopt all those levels, though.

Cheers,
Marco.

[eluser]leonbloy[/eluser]
The current order is plainly wrong. My recent post.