safe_mailto() with <noscript> fallback |
[eluser]Prophet[/eluser]
[quote author="clooner" date="1277814169"]I don't think a safe_mailto will work without any sort of client side scripting. It looks like it now will generate something that will be readable by no one ![]() It seems like you haven't thought this through![/quote] My code produces something along the lines of (using my email address): Code: <noscript><a href="mailto:[email protected]">contact us</a></noscript> Yes, there are bots that will interpret this just fine and still harvest the email address. But in terms of usability, isn't that better than displaying nothing at all (which is what safe_mailto does if the user has javascript disabled)? Edit: ignore the plain-text mailto. It is "encrypted" but the forums seem to want to convert everything |
Messages In This Thread |
safe_mailto() with <noscript> fallback - by El Forum - 06-29-2010, 12:53 AM
safe_mailto() with <noscript> fallback - by El Forum - 06-29-2010, 01:22 AM
safe_mailto() with <noscript> fallback - by El Forum - 06-29-2010, 01:29 AM
safe_mailto() with <noscript> fallback - by El Forum - 06-29-2010, 01:38 AM
safe_mailto() with <noscript> fallback - by El Forum - 06-29-2010, 02:02 AM
safe_mailto() with <noscript> fallback - by El Forum - 06-29-2010, 02:21 AM
safe_mailto() with <noscript> fallback - by El Forum - 06-29-2010, 02:53 AM
|