Reactor Engineers

[eluser]Vheissu[/eluser]
[quote author="narcisha" date="1297272379"]God the whine... Give it some time, at least things move forward. If you don't like it do something about it yourself instead of just the usual whine whine whine whine whine whine. Code the goddamn ACL library yourself if you want it.[/quote]

This thread has nothing to do with ACL, ACL is not auth. I merely pointed out some kind of auth library is wanted it nearly has 1000 votes on UserVoice and yet other little requests are filled. Is it better to do lots of little tasks or do bigger tasks that take more time but are more rewarding and worth waiting for?

As for coding something myself, I have. But the advantages of something being bundled with CI would mean you wouldn't have to fear changes would break your library, even if they are small ones like the change of parent models and controllers.

The problem isn't things aren't being done, it's insignificant things people have hardly requested are being worked on instead. I call that laziness, not progress. If a couple of the developers already wrote a driver based auth system for the Fuel framework, it proves that they can write an auth library for Reactor. Heck, borrow the code from Fuel and change it up, maybe without the ACL part.

And for the record I would love to contribute to Reactor, but I don't get the feeling that Reactor is as community oriented as it proclaims to be. I feel as though any progress I make or anything I do for Reactor will be scrutinised by the six developers and it won't be used.

Next time post something constructive instead of trying to fuel the flames of discontent..