Login

**sv3tli0** · 04-15-2015, 10:23 PM

(04-15-2015, 04:30 PM)includebeer Wrote:
(04-13-2015, 11:55 PM)sv3tli0 Wrote: Backwards Compatibility is pointless thing to watch on..
We are discussing namespaces, need of rebuilding the core of CI, and Backwards Compatibility will be not possible at all..

Backward compatibility is never pointless. It doesn't matter if the core is completely rewritten from scratch. It can still be somewhat compatible without requiring us to rewrite our applications. Your quest for the bleeding edge PHP programming is not worth the time it will all takes us to rewrite everything. What's the point in using a framework if it can back-stab me anytime and render all my previous work worthless. Maybe Laravel is better for you.

I don't say that ci4 should have no BC.. But CI needs some power. If we focus on keeping maximum BC you will have result as IE 10 .. New which is already old ..

This is major release until it there will be CI 3 versions perhaps 3.1 / 3.2 ..
You are can to keep your apps on CI 3 no body is forcing anyone to upgrade..

BTW I am using CI, Laravel and Symfony and I will be very happy if CI 4 will be the one in my future projects as its hard to know all small tricks and details of 3 frameworks at once..

Best VPS Hosting : Digital Ocean

Poll: Improved routing? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes	82.98%	39	82.98%
no	8.51%	4	8.51%
maybe	8.51%	4	8.51%
Total		47 vote(s)	100%