[Question] Language support in ftp and xmlrpc libraries

The ftp and xmlrpc/xmlrpcs libraries encapsulate communication protocols.
The ftp library has a language settings file, while the xmlrpc libraries do not.
Should these be treated the same?

If these are to be treated consistently, it would appear that either the ftp language settings should be eliminated (brought into the Ftp class as English only), or else that we should consider adding a language settings file for the XML-RPC.

Do you use the Ftp library? Are translations appropriate?
Do you use the Xmlrpc libraries? Would translations be appropriate?

Inquiring minds want to know

Should these be treated the same?

Absolutly yes!

No, I am not using the FTP library, but I think it should provide translations and yes, they are appropriate.

Yes I am using XMLRPC, but only for automated tasks without showing any error message to the users. If something bad occurs I make a new log entry with the error message. I think we should be consistent and provide translations to the Xmlrpc library too.