Routing question: possible to create a catch-all when not calling a function?

Routing question: possible to create a catch-all when not calling a function?

El Forum
Guest

10-06-2009, 08:56 AM

[eluser]Fabdrol[/eluser]
Yep, It works like a charm. Yet so simple, I was bumping my head against the wall wondering why I didn't think of that! ;-)
Thanks!

Messages In This Thread

Routing question: possible to create a catch-all when not calling a function? - by El Forum - 10-05-2009, 09:56 AM

Routing question: possible to create a catch-all when not calling a function? - by El Forum - 10-05-2009, 10:27 AM

Routing question: possible to create a catch-all when not calling a function? - by El Forum - 10-06-2009, 08:48 AM

Routing question: possible to create a catch-all when not calling a function? - by El Forum - 10-06-2009, 08:50 AM

Routing question: possible to create a catch-all when not calling a function? - by El Forum - 10-06-2009, 08:56 AM