CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? |
[eluser]kucerar[/eluser]
[quote author="charlieD" date="1192304497"]...or any other alternatives? ...I find that most CMS are bloated and focus on 'articles' (i.e. large blocks of HTML) rather than key/value pairs which is what I need on most real websites.[/quote] For bound wigdetry and attribute/value pairs(binding to legacy tables) there's also http://www.phppeanuts.org/site/index.php and http://weblite.ca/dataface I found neither of these compared to ATK in terms of finishedness or functionality. phpPeanuts URLs aren't any prettier than ATK's, which are admittedly ugly. ATK is unfortunately not a library but rather a monolith, to make use of it as a library, a lot of refactoring would be required to centralize the function that generated the URLs (the model for URLs will look like is a design assumption scattered throughout the code). If you were to attempt to use CI as a front controller the URL problem is the first hurdle. What are the widgets generating for URLs and is it customizable? -R |
Messages In This Thread |
CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? - by El Forum - 10-13-2007, 08:41 AM
CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? - by El Forum - 10-13-2007, 09:07 AM
CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? - by El Forum - 10-13-2007, 10:08 AM
CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? - by El Forum - 10-13-2007, 11:53 AM
CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? - by El Forum - 10-15-2007, 07:00 AM
CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? - by El Forum - 10-15-2007, 11:02 AM
CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? - by El Forum - 10-15-2007, 11:14 AM
CRUD - Rapyd vs CodeCrafter? - by El Forum - 10-15-2007, 11:29 AM
|