re-route with optional argument. possible bug??

re-route with optional argument. possible bug??

harpreet
Junior Member
Posts: 13
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 0

#13

06-09-2016, 05:28 AM

(06-09-2016, 05:07 AM)ciadmin Wrote:
(06-09-2016, 02:17 AM)harpreet Wrote:
(06-09-2016, 02:10 AM)ciadmin Wrote: The parameter in your rule is not optional. You need to do what cartalot suggested in the first reply to your post.

So should we consider this "missing feature" or "bug"?

No - this is just the way the routing works ... nothing "missing" and not a "bug".

OK thanks.

Harpreet Bhatia
Web Developer / Analyst
Technical Reviewer - "Codeigniter 2 Cookbook"

Messages In This Thread

re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by harpreet - 06-07-2016, 10:58 PM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by cartalot - 06-08-2016, 01:43 PM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by harpreet - 06-08-2016, 08:19 PM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by arma7x - 06-08-2016, 11:56 PM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by harpreet - 06-09-2016, 12:00 AM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by arma7x - 06-09-2016, 01:09 AM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by harpreet - 06-09-2016, 01:19 AM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by arma7x - 06-09-2016, 01:12 AM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by ciadmin - 06-09-2016, 02:10 AM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by harpreet - 06-09-2016, 02:17 AM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by ciadmin - 06-09-2016, 05:07 AM

RE: re-route with optional argument. possible bug?? - by harpreet - 06-09-2016, 05:28 AM