Poll: Should we include FlySystem? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Yes - bundle that bad boy in | 14 | 41.18% | |
No - keep our stuff simpler | 20 | 58.82% | |
Total | 34 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Should we integrate Flysystem |
FlySystem is a very flexible library that supports multiple filesystems (including Dropbox, S3, etc).
When looking at our helpers, I started thinking that the file, directory, and path helpers should simply be included into one new package that handled it all in an OO way. However, at that point it makes sense to make it easily extendable... and before too long we're duplicating what FlySystem has already done. For the most point, we're avoiding loading packages for packages sake, but I'm curious what people think about including this one to replace those helpers? |