[eluser]WoOzY KinG[/eluser]
Quote:I think it’s a bit misnamed because the libraries do more than just take care of ajax.
TOTALLY AGREED!!! What I can come up with is that the Google people just want to make it consistant with other Google AJAX APIs. But the good thing is that they didn't strip any other functionalities other than Ajax of these libs (and it would consume huge amount of time and man power to do that, I suppose).
Quote:What if the library isn’t available on a regional server
What I really suggest is that if we could have an OPTION to load the script using the API. Because What I'm not sure is whether the integration of jQuery and CI has resulted some changes in jQuery's core to suit the structure of CI. In that case, my suggestion would be pointless anyways. It would be nice to have somebody from the dev team answer this question.
